Elizabeth Film Questions Essay

Elizabeths time was very complicated, especially for a lady ruler. Hers was a time when the women were regarded to be inferior to the men. Monarchy was invariably about the King, and the Queen was only regarded as the beargonr of the son. Elizabeth was able to walk out above the rest by telling them that women in any case had the capabilities that men had. As a ruler, the intellectual capabilities and will to lead are needed. Being a man or a woman is only a facade that whitethorn be given by muckle all throughout. Elizabeths unique way somewhat gave me the idea that life is indeed establish on the perception of people.All should be regarded equally, and that chances should be given to early(a)s who gestate not tasted success. Furthermore, Elizabeth never showed any sign of weakness during her reign, and I deal that this is something that former(a)s should learn to follow. Decisions in the work force are not always based on the emotions of people, exclusively on what is ri ght and appropriate. I also believe that is just proper for all to live an open headway so that disappointments may be avoided. 9. Elizabeth inflexible to become married to her agate line. What are the pros and cons of such a choice?Committing entirely to a specific job is something that people should learn to take seriously. At a young age, Elizabeth decided to become married to her job as Queen of England. For this, she had to leave her individual(prenominal) life behind, and had to prioritize the welfare of her people above anyone else. Unlike other women, Elizabeth executed a fiery heart that was far different from other women her age. As the queen mole rat, she led her army during the Golden Age, while the women stayed home to leave to the needs of the children.The pride and honor that would come with such action is unreplaceable with any sum of money however, going home alone is some other unfair effect. Since she favoured not to marry, she was left alone with no one t o grow to in times of heartaches. She had to resolve her queries alone, and had to be strong when she was feeling lowly. 12. If you were queen or king of your organization what would you do? Do you think its easy to be a monarch or a chief operating officer? Why or why not? If I were King, I would take for a administration where freedom exists.I do not penury my people to be afraid by my mere presence, nor would they be hindered from diffusion their sentiments to me and my government. In addition to this, I also want to rein a country where love and peace exists, and where others would be happy by the impartial things in life. However, I also want to put a specify on the kind of openness that may exist between the government and the people. I deem it necessary so that the people would learn to normal an honest and simple life. Personally, I believe that both positions are kinda difficult to accomplish in their own little ways. However, I would opt to be a CEO than be a King of a land.Work as a CEO is only isolated to the problems that may be experienced by a company, as compared to the numerous problems that may be placed on the head of the King. Each decision that is do by the CEO is geared towards the success and improvement of the company alone, but may turn the other way around when placed in the wrong set of hands. Regardless of such impediments, I believe that people should learn to keep an open mind for change in bless to accomplish everything in a more positive note. May it be a King or a CEO, what is important is the fact that as ruler, I may be able to fulfill my duties geared towards the hullabaloo of life.